From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119787 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2016 15:50:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 119771 invoked by uid 89); 19 Apr 2016 15:50:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:50:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0FC564064; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3JFoc4x024565; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:50:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Build GDB as a C++ program by default To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1461000466-31668-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <571633C8.4060803@ericsson.com> <57163E3B.50101@redhat.com> <571652FA.1010904@ericsson.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <571653CE.7010805@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:50:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <571652FA.1010904@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00457.txt.bz2 On 04/19/2016 04:47 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > Yeah, it makes sense. I thought that you wanted to go gradually, > flipping to C++ by default only the hosts we have tested, so that > we see which ones are remaining (and test them). That was the original intention, but Joel convinced me otherwise: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2016-04/msg00011.html ( I'm easy to convince :-) ) > But I have absolutely no objection with flipping the switch globally :). Thanks, Pedro Alves