From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130551 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2016 14:44:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 130507 invoked by uid 89); 19 Apr 2016 14:44:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:U*rth, road X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:44:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFADB7F6B4; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigtime.twiddle.net (ovpn-113-39.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.39]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3JEi1iL023456; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:44:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support for x86 segments as address classes To: "Tedeschi, Walfred" , "gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <1446558190-13482-1-git-send-email-rth@redhat.com> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <57164404.8060702@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:44:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00445.txt.bz2 On 04/19/2016 07:13 AM, Tedeschi, Walfred wrote: > I was about to prepare also a patch about the same topic. > Intention is to make fs_base and gs_base available for the user. > > Have you gave up this patch, or have you found some road blocker? I ran out of time at first, and then forgot about this patch set across the Christmas break. If you'd like to pick it up, please do. r~