From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111525 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2016 15:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 111510 invoked by uid 89); 14 Apr 2016 15:17:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:929 X-HELO: usplmg20.ericsson.net Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (HELO usplmg20.ericsson.net) (198.24.6.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:17:34 +0000 Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by usplmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F9.E5.09012.3FDAF075; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [142.133.110.144] (147.117.188.8) by smtp-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.188.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:17:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Change gdb_load_shlibs to gdb_load_shlib To: Yao Qi References: <1460502865-10999-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <864mb4o7qq.fsf@gmail.com> CC: , , From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <570FB48A.8000201@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <864mb4o7qq.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2 On 16-04-14 05:33 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > Simon Marchi writes: > >> -proc gdb_load_shlibs { args } { >> - foreach file $args { >> - gdb_remote_download target [shlib_target_file $file] >> - } >> +proc gdb_load_shlib { file } { >> + set dest [gdb_remote_download target [shlib_target_file $file]] > > Why don't define a new proc gdb_load_shlib but leave gdb_load_shlibs > there? gdb_load_shlibs can invoke gdb_load_shlib in a loop, and callers > of gdb_load_shlibs are not changed. It would have been the lazy but clever way to do it, for sure. I hadn't thought of that. I am not sure I like it though, because it makes multiple procs that do kind of the same thing, but with subtle differences. That's what causes confusion later. It's the same feeling I had about gdb_download and gdb_remote_download... Pedro (and others), what do you think?