From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93630 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2016 12:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 93479 invoked by uid 89); 14 Apr 2016 12:03:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=alright X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:03:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BF3C04B312 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3EC3Ou3010963; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:03:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid "format not a string literal" warnings To: Sergio Durigan Junior References: <1460574365-21910-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <8737qpp8sg.fsf@redhat.com> <570EAB47.8040102@redhat.com> <87y48hnrw8.fsf@redhat.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <570F870C.5050808@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y48hnrw8.fsf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 On 04/13/2016 10:03 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > For sure. I'd say go ahead with your way, no reason to bikeshed over > this :-). Alright, now pushed. Thanks, Pedro Alves