From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: James-Adam Renquinha Henri <arenquinha@cimeq.qc.ca>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@gmail.com>,
Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (ARM Cortex-M) FPU and PSP aware exception frame unwinder
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570C1D85.1060706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5706DA27.1070308@cimeq.qc.ca>
Hi,
[Adding a few folks who either worked on or expressed
interest in this before.]
On 04/07/2016 11:07 PM, James-Adam Renquinha Henri wrote:
> I submitted it as a bug to the GNU ARM Embedded initially, see here for
> details: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+bug/1566054
>
> Basically, this patch allow gdb to unwind properly an extended stack
> frame, that is an exception frame with FPU state stacked. Additionally,
> because all Cortex-M variants have 2 stack pointers, the Main Stack
> Pointer (MSP) and the Process Stack Pointer (PSP), the code in the patch
> also check which stack was used prior to the exception. That way,
> backtraces work beautifully.
>
> In my original submission, I mentioned a known issue that I didn't try
> to fix *yet*, because that would involve a lot more work, and the impact
> is relatively minor: for a given outer frame, some FPU registers may not
> be reported correctly. I hope you don't mind too much. I consider the
> current patch still useful, because at least backtraces work, and it's
> an annoyance not to be able to get them.
>
Thanks for the patch. However, we should really add new target
descriptions/features that describe these registers to gdb
instead of looking them up by name. Please see:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-12/msg00273.html
And see more in this earlier attempt at getting the unwinder working:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-09/msg00649.html
Tristan also wrote yet another patch for the same, as mentioned at:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-12/msg00281.html
Tristan, did you ever manage to post that?
Lots of duplicated effort. :-/ :-(
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-11 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 22:07 James-Adam Renquinha Henri
2016-04-11 21:03 ` Luis Machado
2016-04-20 16:23 ` James-Adam Renquinha Henri
2016-04-20 16:27 ` Luis Machado
2016-04-11 21:56 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-04-14 6:34 ` Tristan Gingold
2016-04-20 23:14 ` James-Adam Renquinha Henri
2016-04-22 14:17 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570C1D85.1060706@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=arenquinha@cimeq.qc.ca \
--cc=chrisfriedt@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gingold@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox