From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47577 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2016 13:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 47567 invoked by uid 89); 5 Apr 2016 13:47:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:345 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:47:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B9CC04D2ED; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u35DlTpY009177; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:47:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Update py-mi-objfile to expect console format print To: Catalin-Dan Udma , Catalin Udma , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <1459851290-13123-1-git-send-email-catalin.udma@freescale.com> <57039A9E.4010408@redhat.com> <5703A892.6090003@redhat.com> <5703B968.7010307@redhat.com> <5703BA12.2090602@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <5703C1F1.5020005@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 On 04/05/2016 02:36 PM, Catalin-Dan Udma wrote: > The former gdb.execute ("interpreter-exec mi \"-gdb-show width\"") does not crash the gdb > in any combination of the two patches in discussion. Thanks. Let's indeed just update the comments then. Thanks, Pedro Alves