From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110729 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2016 18:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 110716 invoked by uid 89); 31 Mar 2016 18:44:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Stop X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:44:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A395D804F9; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2VIiJG2002650; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:44:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] Stop throwing exceptions from signal handlers To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1458328714-4938-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <56F050EE.8040703@ericsson.com> <56FD379A.6060007@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <56FD7003.2030104@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:44:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56FD379A.6060007@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2 On 03/31/2016 03:43 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 03/21/2016 07:52 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> I went over the series, and I understood some of the words used. What I understood >> looked very good. For the rest, I trust you are doing the right thing. :) > > :-) Feel free to ask about anything, and I'll try to clarify. > >> Thanks a lot for doing this, since this is the major roadblock before we can't start >> using C++! > > Yup! I'm looking forward to have this in, and switch back > TRY/CATCH to be backed by real C++ exceptions, again. > > I think that this might bring in the speed up Yichun Zhang > wanted here: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00272.html > > if he builds in C++ mode, of course. Actually, this series makes it possible to use setjmp instead of sigsetjump for all GDB exceptions and thus get the speedup in C mode as well. > If anyone else wants to take a look at the series, > please let me know. Otherwise, I'd like to push it in soon. Thanks, Pedro Alves