From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119420 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2016 12:07:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 119407 invoked by uid 89); 31 Mar 2016 12:07:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*macro, rozycki, Hx-languages-length:686, peace X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:07:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 399DC804FA; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2VC7Qvm003745; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:07:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Remove support for "target m32rsdi" and "target mips/pmon/ddb/rockhopper/lsi" To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" References: <1458230389-28233-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <8637rivld3.fsf@gmail.com> <56F13269.8020602@redhat.com> Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <56FD12FE.1030300@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2 On 03/30/2016 11:17 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Anyway, having read your request to remove remote-mips.c I was fairly > sure it could go, but to be double sure I asked around too, to see if > there could be any legacy users. All replies were negative, so I'm fine > to let it rest in peace. I can't speak of remote-m32r-sdi.c. Thanks for the double checks Maciej. "target m32rsdi" is also as dead as it can be, AFAIK. Red Hat / GNUPro used to support it years ago, but Kevin says he also hasn't heard about any use in years. I'll push the patch in in a bit. Thanks, Pedro Alves