From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29673 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2016 18:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29626 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2016 18:24:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:869, ctrl-c, ctrlc X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:24:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3708F15555; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2LIOVGH027403; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:24:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/30] Decouple target_interrupt from all-stop/non-stop modes To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1458328714-4938-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1458328714-4938-17-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <56F03BBE.3090906@ericsson.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <56F03C5E.2010603@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:24:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F03BBE.3090906@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 On 03/21/2016 06:21 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 16-03-18 03:18 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> In non-stop mode, "interrupt" results in a "stop with no mode, it >> results in a remote interrupt request / stop with SIGINT. This is > > I don't really understand the first sentence, is there something missing? Urgh, yes, looks like I deleted a line or something. It should have read: In non-stop mode, "interrupt" results in a "stop with no signal", while in all-stop mode, it results in a remote interrupt request / stop with SIGINT. This is (...) > >> currently implemented in both the Linux and remote target backends. >> Move it to the core code instead, making target_interrupt specifically >> always about "Interrupting as if with Ctrl-C", just like it is >> documented. Thanks, Pedro Alves