From: Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PR 18303, Tolerate malformed input for lookup_symbol-called functions.
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E88D3C.3000202@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e89a8ffbadef290735052e1c44a3@google.com>
On 3/15/2016 1:30 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> Don Breazeal writes:
> > Apologies -- the previous version of this patch was missing one file,
> > added here. Sorry for the noise.
> > --Don
> >
> > ---V3 Comment---
> > This patch differs from v2 in that the new test
> gdb.linespec/ls-errs-cp.exp
> > is gone, and instead (per Pedro's suggestion) gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp
> has
> > been modified to test both C & C++, and to incorporate the small amount
> of
> > extra testing from ls-errs-cp.exp.
> >
> > It also includes, unchanged from the previous version of the patch:
> >
> > * an updated version of the alternate fix that Keith proposed for my
> > patch that addressed PR breakpoints/18303. Doug has approved (in
> > concept, at least) the code portion of the patch.
> >
> > * a couple of other new tests of colons in linespecs.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Don
> >
> > -----------
> > lookup_symbol is often called with user input. Consequently, any
> > function called from lookup_symbol{,_in_language} should attempt to
> > deal with malformed input gracefully. After all, malformed user
> > input is not a programming/API error.
> >
> > This patch does not attempt to find/correct all instances of this. It
> > only fixes locations in the code that trigger test suite failures.
> >
> > This patch fixes PR breakpoints/18303, "Assertion: -breakpoint-insert
> > with windows paths of file in non-current directory".
> >
> > The patch includes three new tests related to this. One is just
> > gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp copied and converted to use C++ instead of C,
> and
> > to add a case using a file name containing a Windows-style logical drive
> > specifier. The others include an MI test to provide a regression test
> for
> > the specific case reported in PR 18303, and a C++ test for proper error
> > handling of access to a program variable when using a file scope
> specifier
> > that refers to a non-existent file.
> >
> > Tested on x86_64 native Linux.
> >
> > gdb/ChangeLog
> > 2016-01-28 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
> >
> > PR breakpoints/18303
> > * cp-namespace.c (cp_lookup_bare_symbol): Change assertion to
> > look for "::" instead of simply ":".
> > (cp_search_static_and_baseclasses): Return null_block_symbol for
> > malformed input.
> > Remove assertions.
> > * cp-support.c (cp_find_first_component_aux): Do not return
> > a prefix length for ':' unless the next character is also ':'.
> >
> > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > 2016-01-28 Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * gdb.cp/scope-err.cc: New test program.
> > * gdb.cp/scope-err.exp: New test script.
> > * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.c (myfunction): Expanded to have multiple
> > lines and "set breakpoint here" comment.
> > * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Added C++ testing and new test case.
> > * gdb.mi/mi-linespec-err-cp.cc: New test program.
> > * gdb.mi/mi-linespec-err-cp.exp: New test script.
> >...
>
> Hi.
> LGTM
>
This is now pushed. Keith FYI I made some whitespace/format changes per
your comments.
Thanks,
--Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 20:30 Doug Evans
2016-03-15 22:31 ` Don Breazeal [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-28 22:43 [PATCH v3] " Don Breazeal
2016-01-28 22:52 ` [PATCH v4] " Don Breazeal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E88D3C.3000202@codesourcery.com \
--to=donb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox