From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 37856 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2016 17:49:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 37839 invoked by uid 89); 9 Mar 2016 17:49:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=approving, Basically, Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA X-HELO: out1-smtp.messagingengine.com Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:49:29 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D60D20911 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:49:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:49:27 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (host86-179-112-186.range86-179.btcentralplus.com [86.179.112.186]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AEF5EC0001E; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:49:26 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Better handling for realpath() failures in windows_make_so() on Cygwin To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1453305146-7364-1-git-send-email-jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> <569FB386.4010903@redhat.com> From: Jon Turney Message-ID: <56E06222.9010909@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:49:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <569FB386.4010903@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 On 20/01/2016 16:19, Pedro Alves wrote: > #define SO_NAME_MAX_PATH_SIZE 512 /* FIXME: Should be dynamic */ > > How about just removing the limit altogether? > > Basically, make struct so_list::so_original_name and > struct so_list::so_name pointers instead of arrays? I'm sorry, while that would be nice to have, that's not a project that I can take on currently. In the meantime, please consider approving this patch, or tell me what I can do to make it acceptable, since it does fix an actual problem that affects some users.