From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 34569 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2016 01:22:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 34552 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2016 01:22:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=bah X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 01:22:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAB4EC00B8EE; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 01:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1P1MINU027493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:22:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] [PR gdb/14441] gdb: gdbtypes: add definitions for rvalue reference type To: Artemiy Volkov References: <1450661481-31178-1-git-send-email-artemiyv@acm.org> <1453229609-20159-1-git-send-email-artemiyv@acm.org> <1453229609-20159-2-git-send-email-artemiyv@acm.org> <56C763C2.8090207@redhat.com> <20160223070313.GA1564@gmail.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Keith Seitz Message-ID: <56CE574A.2000406@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 01:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160223070313.GA1564@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00764.txt.bz2 On 02/22/2016 11:03 PM, Artemiy Volkov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:49:38AM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote: > > Do you suggest keeping only the lvalue version of the reference type and > then adjust its type code from TYPE_CODE_REF to TYPE_CODE_RVALUE_REF on > lookup_rvalue_reference_type()? It seems somewhat hacky to me. E.g. how > would we be able to create a struct type for a complex type involving a > T&&, such as a typedef of it? Bah. No, I am wrong. Please disregard this comment. Sorry about the confusion. Keith