Re: [PATCH] Remote debugging without a binary (regression)

Pedro Alves
2016-02-12T16:36:49Z

On 02/12/2016 04:08 PM, Luis Machado wrote:

> I did not exercise that, but did not discard it either. I was attempting
> to solve one problem at a time. There may be a failure there too.

I matters to determine where the TRY/CATCH should go, or even whether
the fix should be to not throw in the first place.

Like, with:

(gdb) define foo
> attach PID
> info threads
> end
(gdb) foo

should failing to load the executable error out before
reaching "info threads", or continue.

I think it should not error out, like we don't error out
if the target doesn't support target_pid_to_exec_file
at all.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves