From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remote debugging without a binary (regression)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BCC817.70205@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56BCC583.1050209@redhat.com>
On 02/11/2016 03:31 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 05:06 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>> Does that make it clear?
>
> Sounds like we're missing a test. Say, a test in gdb.server/
> that:
>
> #1 - does "set sysroot /dev/null"
> #2 - connects
> #3 - does "disassemble", "si", "info registers", or something.
>
> Sounds like we currently fail step #2. Steps #3 would be there just
> to make sure the session is not semi-borked even if we connected
> successfully.
Yeah. Unfortunately that does not work well because GDB is smart enough
to try and load the binary gdbserver loaded, which happens to be sitting
in the same filesystem, so it won't fail.
I also attempted to delete the binary right after firing gdbserver up,
but it also does not fail, though GDB acknowledges now that the file has
been deleted.
The problematic scenario appears when one has two distinct filesystems.
Say, one in each machine. Then GDB won't be able to load the symbol file
and will error out.
This is usually the case when one is doing Linux cross debugging.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 14:19 Luis Machado
2016-02-11 16:35 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-11 17:06 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-11 17:31 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-11 17:42 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2016-02-12 10:31 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-12 10:59 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-12 15:24 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-17 13:53 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-17 14:40 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-17 17:02 ` [OB PATCH] Add missing cleanup in exec_file_locate_attach Gary Benson
2016-02-17 17:05 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-17 18:11 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-18 9:54 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-18 17:05 ` [PATCH] Fix logic " Gary Benson
2016-02-18 17:28 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-19 10:24 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-19 10:33 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-19 11:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Gary Benson
2016-02-19 15:38 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 10:40 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-22 11:37 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 13:51 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-22 22:00 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 22:50 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 23:00 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 0:04 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-23 0:13 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 0:16 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-23 11:27 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-23 11:43 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 12:15 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-23 12:20 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 11:55 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-24 11:56 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-12 15:29 ` [PATCH] Remote debugging without a binary (regression) Pedro Alves
2016-02-12 16:08 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-12 16:36 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-12 17:31 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-17 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-18 12:30 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-18 12:40 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BCC817.70205@codesourcery.com \
--to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gbenson@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox