From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14268 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2016 13:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14242 invoked by uid 89); 10 Feb 2016 13:54:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:54:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C775BCFF7; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1ADs91q025903; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:54:09 -0500 Message-ID: <56BB4101.5050902@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:54:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2luIEtvxZtjaWVsbmlja2k=?= , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gdb.trace: Use g packet order in tfile_fetch_registers. References: <1454773157-31569-1-git-send-email-koriakin@0x04.net> <1454773157-31569-4-git-send-email-koriakin@0x04.net> <56BB3924.8050508@redhat.com> <56BB3973.5070305@0x04.net> In-Reply-To: <56BB3973.5070305@0x04.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2 On 02/10/2016 01:21 PM, Marcin Kościelnicki wrote: >> I can't make sense of that. I think we should >> s/and @value{GDBN} register order,// . >> >> WDYT? >> > Yeah, I think so. Should I add it to the patch? Yes please. Thanks, Pedro Alves