From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 50694 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2016 22:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 50590 invoked by uid 89); 9 Feb 2016 22:37:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=court X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:37:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B82D5A4D; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u19MbPse020357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:37:25 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC: branching for GDB 7.11 soon? (possibly Wed) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20160201030638.GG4008@adacore.com> <20160207081230.GA20874@adacore.com> <20160209115617.GG15342@adacore.com> <56B9DD81.5030606@redhat.com> Cc: Joel Brobecker From: Keith Seitz Message-ID: <56BA6A25.4080605@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B9DD81.5030606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 On 02/09/2016 04:37 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 02/09/2016 11:56 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Once again, I am very grateful to everyone who is so responsive >> in trying to help us create that branch! >> >> Quick status update again, based on the latest feedback: >> >>>> PR19506 Regression with gdb.Breakpoint("*") >>> >>> This lead to a wider fix: >>> [PATCH V2 0/4] Add support for "legacy" linespecs >>> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-02/msg00024.html >> >> I took a look over the weekend, and it seems fairly unintrusive. >> I propose we push it now. Otherwise, I think it's safe to create >> the branch before pushing this patch, and backport afterwards. > > I took a quick look and it looks fine to me too. Well, that's two global maintainers who think it looks okay; I've pushed this. >>> There is also a crash (regression): >>> >>> PR 19546 - gdb crash calling exec in the inferior >>> Initial guestimate from Pedro: >>> | Looks like a regression of the explicit locations work. >>> Still in Pedro's court, or could Keith help? >> >> Looks like the fix is fairly straightforward. >> Patch submitted: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-02/msg00245.html Keith