From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66072 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2016 14:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66022 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2016 14:10:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:10:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85EF31136EA; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0MEAYCL032068; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500 Message-ID: <56A23859.4020209@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:10:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2luIEtvxZtjaWVsbmlja2k=?= , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] gdb.trace: Fix write_inferior_data_ptr on 32-bit big-endian machines. References: <1453471015-9921-1-git-send-email-koriakin@0x04.net> <56A2362D.2030109@redhat.com> <56A2377A.5010203@0x04.net> In-Reply-To: <56A2377A.5010203@0x04.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2 On 01/22/2016 02:06 PM, Marcin Kościelnicki wrote: > On 22/01/16 15:01, Pedro Alves wrote: >> OK with empty line after declaration. >> >> Thanks, >> Pedro Alves >> > > Thanks, fixed & pushed. > > Any comment about the bi-arch case? Does that seem like something worth > doing? I think it'd be nice if that worked. > > BTW, don't mind the 1/8 in subject, that was a git-format-patch > accident. The remaining 7 patches are not yet review-ready :) Thanks, Pedro Alves