From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55497 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2016 16:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 55406 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jan 2016 16:02:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:02:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAF6C0AEE44; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0LG2R4K002771; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:02:28 -0500 Message-ID: <56A10113.9090204@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:02:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H.J. Lu" CC: Alan Modra , Binutils , GDB Subject: Re: Use elfcore_write_linux_prstatus in gdb References: <20160121092855.GJ17028@bubble.grove.modra.org> <56A0CE51.1090709@redhat.com> <56A0D901.7010709@redhat.com> <56A0E594.2080303@redhat.com> <56A0EA83.3040403@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 On 01/21/2016 03:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I've updated the branch to install the stop-gap on x32 as well, which >> really ends up calling the same function we call today. >> Please give it a try. >> > > It works. > > Thanks. > Thanks. As this risks breaking core dumping for many architectures, I think we should hold on moving forward with it until after gdb 7.11 branches. Thanks, Pedro Alves