From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56518 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2016 14:07:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56509 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2016 14:07:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=contacting X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:07:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9003BB82B9; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0BE7S3J023583; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:07:29 -0500 Message-ID: <5693B720.6060409@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:07:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tedeschi, Walfred" , Eli Zaretskii CC: "joseph@codesourcery.com" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [OBV PATCH] MPX documentation References: <1450358668-11765-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <83egelyrmd.fsf@gnu.org> <5678030C.6030304@redhat.com> <83lh8nstdx.fsf@gnu.org> <56939524.50406@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 On 01/11/2016 12:35 PM, Tedeschi, Walfred wrote: > Pedro and All, > > Due to internal regulations we would like if possible to keep > the first appearance of the technology in the manual with the (R)? > > Would that be possible? As the GNU Coding Standards clearly tell us not to, I don't think it'll be possible. Maybe you could try contacting the FSF about getting an exception. Thanks, Pedro Alves