Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-20T01:31:40Z

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:25:28PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> > > > > 1) mi_cmd_stack_info_frame uses print_frame_info instead of
> > > > > print_stack_frame. This follows mi_cmd_stack_list_frames and means
> > > > > that the argument values aren't printed.
> ...
>
> > > Which change?
> >
> > #1. Why not print the arguments? I guess your logic is that if you
> > want them, you can find them by a round trip through
> > -stack-list-frames, is that it?
>
> Well, through -stack-list-arguments (mi_cmd_stack_list_frames doesn't print
> arguments: I've used the same call to print_frame_info in -stack-info-frame).
> Also print_stack_frame calls eventually calls print_frame_info after a call to
> catch_errors, so it seemed more efficient.

OK, makes sense. Thank you.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC