Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17T23:01:39Z

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:52:09AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
>
> Here's a patch for -stack-info-frames. Having just read Jason's e-mail
> about how quick "-stack-list-frames 0 0" is, I'm not sure its necessary.
> I thought I'd send it anyway.
>
> Even if we decide not to implement -stack-info-frames, could you please
> approve the other parts: Not testing for stack, and not allowing an argument
> (mi_cmd_stack_select_frame).

How do you feel about putting an optional argument on _this_ one?
-stack-select-frame 0; -stack-info-frame is much like
-stack-list-frames 0 0; but "-stack-info-frame 2" doesn't have an
obvious analogue.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC