From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14385 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 23:11:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14373 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2005 23:11:03 -0000 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:11:03 +0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5HNB1cT001313 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.17) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:11:01 -0700 Received: from [17.201.22.21] (moleja.apple.com [17.201.22.21]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5HNAwiZ011622; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:10:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17075.21529.964955.923197@farnswood.snap.net.nz> References: <17075.21529.964955.923197@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <56871229-51F7-444C-9AE3-2379D67488D2@apple.com> Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Molenda Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:11:00 -0000 To: Nick Roberts X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 On Jun 17, 2005, at 3:52 PM, Nick Roberts wrote: > > Here's a patch for -stack-info-frames. Having just read Jason's e- > mail > about how quick "-stack-list-frames 0 0" is, I'm not sure its > necessary. NB: I don't have any objection to -stack-info-frame; some other GUI designer may find it a convenient command. And it's hardly a burden code-wise in gdb to support the command. It might be nice if there was a simple test case added for it at the same time, but that's my only comment. J