From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67115 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2015 13:48:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 67103 invoked by uid 89); 21 Dec 2015 13:48:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1505, Protection X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:47:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 835028E254; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tBLDluW2002426; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:47:57 -0500 Message-ID: <5678030C.6030304@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:48:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tedeschi, Walfred" , Joseph Myers , Eli Zaretskii CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [OBV PATCH] MPX documentation References: <1450358668-11765-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <83egelyrmd.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 > From: Joseph Myers [mailto:joseph@codesourcery.com] > On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> From: Walfred Tedeschi >>> Fix some trademarks on MPX section. >> >> Do we have to? > > The GNU Coding Standards say "Please do not include any trademark acknowledgements in GNU software packages or documentation.". So the patch is wrong. Does that mean that all existing "(R)" occurrences in the documentation should be removed? $ grep "(R)" * gdb.texinfo:@cindex Intel(R) Processor Trace gdb.texinfo:Use the @dfn{Intel(R) Processor Trace} recording format. In this gdb.texinfo:Set the requested ring buffer size for branch tracing in Intel(R) gdb.texinfo:that uses the btrace recording method and the Intel(R) Processor Trace gdb.texinfo:tracing in Intel(R) Processor Trace format. gdb.texinfo:@subsubsection Intel(R) @dfn{Memory Protection Extensions} (MPX). gdb.texinfo:@cindex Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (MPX). gdb.texinfo:For the Intel(R) Processor Trace recording format, print a list of gdb.texinfo:Intel(R) Processor Trace packets. For each packet, the following gdb.texinfo:Enable branch tracing for the current thread using Intel(R) Processor Trace. gdb.texinfo:This thread uses the @dfn{Intel(R) Processor Trace} (@acronym{Intel(R) gdb.texinfo:The size of the @acronym{Intel(R) PT} ring buffer in bytes. gdb.texinfo:The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.i386.mpx} is an optional feature representing Intel(R) Thanks, Pedro Alves