From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 74734 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2015 15:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 74725 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2015 15:35:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:35:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEC7C0D7F0D; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tB4FZ3i5029554; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:35:05 -0500 Message-ID: <5661B2A7.6020005@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:35:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Kabatsayev CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][PR 18702] Fix wrong output of x87 registers due to truncation to double on amd64 References: <564F998D.5080406@gmail.com> <5660357F.4030605@redhat.com> <5661AD07.5090002@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 On 12/04/2015 03:16 PM, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 12/04/2015 03:06 PM, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >>>> A test to make sure we don't regress this would be nice. >>>> Maybe add something to gdb.arch/i386-float.exp ? >>> >>> I think I'll do this. Should this go as a separate patch? >> >> Ideally it'd go in the same patch. > Oh, OK. What about email subject? Can I just send it as a follow-up to > this conversation, or does it have to be an independent email with > subject="[PATCH]..."? Or is there no difference? > (Sorry for silly questions, I'm just trying to fulfill all the > requirements at the first try :) ) As it's a single patch, reply is fine. Repost as new thread would be fine too. Ideally tagged with "[PATCH v2]" in that case. I suggest using "git send-email" to send patches. Thanks, Pedro Alves