From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126267 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2015 15:50:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 126251 invoked by uid 89); 3 Dec 2015 15:50:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:50:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB5A98F28D; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tB3FoXvk013616; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:50:34 -0500 Message-ID: <566064C9.7000900@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:50:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Run gdb.base/sizeof.exp with board having gdb,noinferiorio References: <1448977402-9487-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <56603F3E.6040703@redhat.com> <86si3jsfbn.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86si3jsfbn.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 On 12/03/2015 03:49 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Pedro Alves writes: > >> I think we can replace that like you did for sizeof. >> >> value = (int) (char) -1; >> >> etc., and then check "p value = ${val}", just like you did for >> the sizeof checks. > > OK, how about this? > LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves