From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1281 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2015 12:08:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 516 invoked by uid 89); 1 Dec 2015 12:07:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 12:07:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C8998F025; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tB1C7sC8014860; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:07:55 -0500 Message-ID: <565D8D9A.9040402@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 12:08:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tedeschi, Walfred" , "Yao Qi (qiyaoltc@gmail.com)" CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Synchronize siginfo type described in GDB with the kernel and glibc ones. References: <1445864086-4831-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <1445864086-4831-3-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <20151118230151.GA7958@adacore.com> <564DCE42.5060000@redhat.com> <564E01BC.4030402@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On 12/01/2015 10:08 AM, Tedeschi, Walfred wrote: > Hello Pedro, > > Thanks a lot for your feedback! > > Moving forward on this patch I observed that there is fixup for 32 and x32 on gdbserver and gdb side. > I suppose we should join both implementation so we patch only once every time! :) That'd be nice. :-) > > To do that I was wondering where should be the appropriated place, the "nat" or the "common" folder. Since this is code used by the (native) target_ops implementations, nat/ is the appropriate place. Thanks, Pedro Alves