From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 86928 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2015 15:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 86905 invoked by uid 89); 30 Nov 2015 15:48:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:48:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A399E14CADC; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAUFm2wc000675; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:48:02 -0500 Message-ID: <565C6FB1.1030406@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:48:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fracting@gmail.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] C++/MinGW patches References: <1446492970-21432-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <5637C1FA.2060708@redhat.com> <5637CB96.4010106@redhat.com> <5638988C.5070601@redhat.com> <5638E6C5.5040006@redhat.com> <563937B4.7080800@redhat.com> <564B3E9D.2020409@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00607.txt.bz2 On 11/30/2015 03:02 PM, Qian Hong wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Since C mode still works fine after my patches, and I can't imagine that it's >> this series that's creating the exceptions/C++ issue you're running into, I'm >> going ahead with pushing the series in. We'll revisit later when we re-wire >> THROW/CATCH to real C++ exceptions later on, if necessary. > > Sorry for long delay. > I communicated with MSYS2 developers, alexey told me he has no time to > look at it deeper soon, so I didn't go farther. > Thank you for the work, I'll put this issue on my todo list and keep > monitoring the list. If there is any interesting thing found I'll > start a new thread. If there is new patch to test on Windows/Wine I'll > also be glad to help. Alright, thanks for the update. Thanks, Pedro Alves