From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93852 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2015 14:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 93841 invoked by uid 89); 30 Nov 2015 14:53:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:53:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F13624C; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAUEr0db011477; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:53:00 -0500 Message-ID: <565C62CB.7070302@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:53:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] gdbserver crash running gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-1.exp References: <1444836486-25679-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1444836486-25679-5-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <86mvv52920.fsf@gmail.com> <565491A1.8020408@redhat.com> <86k2p4wx0m.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86k2p4wx0m.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2 On 11/26/2015 04:22 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Pedro Alves writes: > >> Now that Antoine's series that teaches gdbserver about different breakpoint >> kinds is in, perhaps we could just revert 6085d6f6 now? > > Before we revert 6085d6f6, I need to teach aarch64 GDBserver understand > various arm breakpoint instructions. I'll do that. Thanks Yao, that'd be great! FWIW, I tried to do it myself using an Aarch64 machine on the gcc compile farm but got stuck due to lack of a handy toolchain targeting 32-bit/Aarch32 on those machines. I believe I've addressed all review comments otherwise. Let me know if I missed any. Thanks, Pedro Alves