From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57130 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:48:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 57085 invoked by uid 89); 26 Nov 2015 13:48:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: usplmg21.ericsson.net Received: from usplmg21.ericsson.net (HELO usplmg21.ericsson.net) (198.24.6.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:48:02 +0000 Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usplmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8D.56.32102.E8D07565; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:47:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [142.133.110.95] (147.117.188.8) by smtp-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.188.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:47:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] Replace breakpoint_reinsert_addr by get_next_pcs operation in GDBServer. To: Yao Qi References: <1448287968-12907-1-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> <1448287968-12907-7-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> <868u5lxdct.fsf@gmail.com> CC: From: Antoine Tremblay Message-ID: <56570D8F.7010209@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <868u5lxdct.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00558.txt.bz2 On 11/26/2015 05:29 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > Antoine Tremblay writes: > >> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog: >> * linux-aarch64-low.c (struct linux_target_ops): Rename >> breakpoint_reinsert_addr to get_next_pcs. > > Nit: the change is to the_low_target, not "struct linux_target_ops", so > it should be > Right indeed. fixed.