From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 91775 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2015 16:20:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 91738 invoked by uid 89); 19 Nov 2015 16:20:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:20:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A86542E5D0; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAJGKBoa023325; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:20:12 -0500 Message-ID: <564DF6BB.9080200@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:20:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jose E. Marchesi" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][SPARC] Add missing include in test program gdb.arch/sparc-sysstep.c References: <877flegdud.fsf@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <877flegdud.fsf@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 On 11/19/2015 04:20 PM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc-sysstep.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc-sysstep.c > index 79e344b..a29174f 100644 > --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc-sysstep.c > +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc-sysstep.c > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > + > /* Test single-stepping system call instructions in sparc. Spurious change above? Otherwise OK. Thanks, Pedro Alves