Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix inconsistent breakpoint kinds between breakpoints and tracepoints in GDBServer.
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56290C4E.4050208@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56290BE8.5080401@ericsson.com>



On 10/22/2015 12:16 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote:
>
>
> On 10/22/2015 12:11 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 05:06 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2015 12:04 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>
>>>> (I think you'll need to move the function to target.c to
>>>> fix !Linux ports, but I'm OK with doing that as a separate step.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think so since I fix !linux ports like so :
>>>
>>> /* Implementation of the target_ops method
>>> "breakpoint_kind_from_pc".  */
>>>
>>> static int
>>> win32_breakpoint_kind_from_pc (CORE_ADDR *pcptr)
>>> {
>>>     return the_low_target.breakpoint_len;
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> You don't need this one nor the equivalent in other ports if you
>> add this to target.h:
>>
>> #define target_breakpoint_kind_from_pc(PCPTR) \
>>    (the_target->breakpoint_kind_from_pc \
>>      ? (*the_target->breakpoint_kind_from_pc) (PCPTR) \
>>      : default_breakpoint_kind_from_pc ())
>>
>> (see the other similar macros there)
>>
>> You'll need to adjust callers to call target_breakpoint_kind_from_pc
>> instead, of course.
>>
>
> Yes but then I would need a os_arch_sw_breakpoint_from_kind operation in
> all the arch that this os supports (and that I can't test), you think
> it's still better that way ?
>

Unless I have another macro that checks for the sw_breakpoint_from_kind 
and if abscent returns breakpoint_len... I could do that I guess..


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-22 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-22 16:04 [PATCH] " Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 16:11 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 16:14   ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 16:23   ` [PATCH v2] " Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 16:26     ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 17:42       ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 19:58         ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 19:58           ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 19:58             ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-23  1:42               ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-23  8:18                 ` Antoine Tremblay [this message]
2015-10-23  8:52                   ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-23 15:05                     ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-23 16:48             ` Antoine Tremblay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56290C4E.4050208@ericsson.com \
    --to=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox