From: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix inconsistent breakpoint kinds between breakpoints and tracepoints in GDBServer.
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56290C4E.4050208@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56290BE8.5080401@ericsson.com>
On 10/22/2015 12:16 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote:
>
>
> On 10/22/2015 12:11 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 05:06 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2015 12:04 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>
>>>> (I think you'll need to move the function to target.c to
>>>> fix !Linux ports, but I'm OK with doing that as a separate step.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think so since I fix !linux ports like so :
>>>
>>> /* Implementation of the target_ops method
>>> "breakpoint_kind_from_pc". */
>>>
>>> static int
>>> win32_breakpoint_kind_from_pc (CORE_ADDR *pcptr)
>>> {
>>> return the_low_target.breakpoint_len;
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> You don't need this one nor the equivalent in other ports if you
>> add this to target.h:
>>
>> #define target_breakpoint_kind_from_pc(PCPTR) \
>> (the_target->breakpoint_kind_from_pc \
>> ? (*the_target->breakpoint_kind_from_pc) (PCPTR) \
>> : default_breakpoint_kind_from_pc ())
>>
>> (see the other similar macros there)
>>
>> You'll need to adjust callers to call target_breakpoint_kind_from_pc
>> instead, of course.
>>
>
> Yes but then I would need a os_arch_sw_breakpoint_from_kind operation in
> all the arch that this os supports (and that I can't test), you think
> it's still better that way ?
>
Unless I have another macro that checks for the sw_breakpoint_from_kind
and if abscent returns breakpoint_len... I could do that I guess..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 16:04 [PATCH] " Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 16:11 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 16:14 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 16:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 16:26 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 17:42 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 19:58 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 19:58 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-22 19:58 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-23 1:42 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-23 8:18 ` Antoine Tremblay [this message]
2015-10-23 8:52 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-23 15:05 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-10-23 16:48 ` Antoine Tremblay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56290C4E.4050208@ericsson.com \
--to=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox