From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] NEWS: "info" commands now list in ascending order
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628FBB2.1030905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83io5zt0bi.fsf@gnu.org>
On 10/22/2015 04:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:59:04 +0100
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>> 2015-10-22 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>>
>> * NEWS: Mention that a few "info" commands now list the
>> corresponding items in ascending order.
>> ---
>> gdb/NEWS | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
>> index b2b1e99..e16e861 100644
>> --- a/gdb/NEWS
>> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
>> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@
>>
>> * GDB now supports displaced stepping on AArch64 GNU/Linux.
>>
>> +* "info threads", "info inferiors", "info display", "info checkpoints"
>> + and "maint info program-spaces" now list the corresponding items in
>> + ascending order, for consistency with all other "info" commands.
> ^^
> I'd suggest to add "alphabetic" where indicated.
That would sound very confusing to me, as we sort by e.g., thread
ID, not thread name, and alphabetic would suggest to me that we
now sort by "name" or whatever else looks like a name.
Would "ascending ID order" or "ascending numerical order"
instead be OK with you?
>
> Otherwise, this is fine, thanks.
>
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 10:56 [PATCH 0/6] PR 17539 - inferiors/threads etc. print in reverse order Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 10:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] List checkpoints in ascending order Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 10:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] Linux: dump the signalled thread first Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] List inferiors/threads/pspaces in ascending order Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 16:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-01-08 20:39 ` Regression for gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp [Re: [PATCH 3/6] List inferiors/threads/pspaces in ascending order] Jan Kratochvil
2016-01-11 14:40 ` Pedro Alves
2016-01-12 11:22 ` Pedro Alves
2016-01-13 0:37 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] Make gdb.python/py-inferior.exp test names unique Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 11:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] NEWS: "info" commands now list in ascending order Pedro Alves
2015-10-22 16:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-22 16:06 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-10-22 16:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-22 12:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] List displays " Pedro Alves
2015-11-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 0/6] PR 17539 - inferiors/threads etc. print in reverse order Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5628FBB2.1030905@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox