From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19955 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2015 14:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19888 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2015 14:07:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:07:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672B1C062C96; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t99E7Uq1020323; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:07:31 -0400 Message-ID: <5617CA22.7060104@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:07:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH c++] Change some void* to gdb_byte* References: <1444341261-5714-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <56178E8C.5040407@redhat.com> <5617BCAF.8070704@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <5617BCAF.8070704@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 On 10/09/2015 02:10 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 15-10-09 05:53 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> This will need a fix similar to 39086a0e13: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-03/msg00449.html > > Good find! Here is the updated version. Only py-inferior.c changed. I also > noticed that infpy_write_memory needed the same change, I don't know why I > didn't include it in the original patch. LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves