From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15118 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 15:10:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 15095 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2011 15:10:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:10:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08393CB0371; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:10:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjjWNE9c7KfC; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCB8CB0386; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:10:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: FYI: implement new DWARF macro proposal Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:31:00 -0000 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <55FCF721-6677-4D1F-925E-D0AACF25FB67@adacore.com> References: <63F9CC20-59B3-4D4A-AE35-069BBCD94909@adacore.com> To: Tom Tromey X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00762.txt.bz2 On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Tristan> Looks like you forgot to update the table for AIX. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > I am checking in the appended. It adds this entry, and it also changes > dwarf2_debug_sections to make it less likely that future changes will > have the same problem. Now if you forget to add a name to an instance > of the struct, you will see an error from the compiler. Good idea. (I thought that C didn't accept missing fields of a structure initializer -= but looks like I was wrong). Tristan.