From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14705 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 17:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14695 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2015 17:04:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-io0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f170.google.com) (209.85.223.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:04:36 +0000 Received: by iofh134 with SMTP id h134so63033542iof.0 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:04:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.129.65 with SMTP id c62mr16801385iod.4.1442595873974; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dl.caveonetworks.com (64.2.3.194.ptr.us.xo.net. [64.2.3.194]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 21sm4064970ioo.16.2015.09.18.10.04.32 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55FC441F.6080804@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:04:00 -0000 From: David Daney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expect SI_KERNEL si_code for a MIPS software breakpoint trap References: <1442592647-3051-1-git-send-email-lgustavo@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00479.txt.bz2 We have to be very careful changing the ABI here. This is used by almost all userspace code to detect integer division by zero. Many things like the libgcj runtime use this to generate runtime exceptions, we don't want to break them. David Daney On 09/18/2015 09:56 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi Luis, > >> I tracked this down to the lack of a proper definition of what MIPS' kernel >> returns in the si_code for a software breakpoint trap. >> >> Though i did not find documentation about this, tests showed that we should >> check for SI_KERNEL, just like i386. I've cc-ed Maciej, just to be sure this >> is indeed correct. > > Hmm, the MIPS/Linux port does not set any particular code for SIGTRAP, > all such signals will have the SI_KERNEL default, so you may well return > TRUE unconditionally. > > I'm not convinced however that it is safe to assume all SIGTRAPs come > from breakpoints -- this signal is sent by the kernel for both BREAK and > trap (multiple mnemonics, e.g. TEQ, TGEI, etc.) instructions which may > have been placed throughout code for some reason, for example to serve as > cheap assertion checks. > > Is there a separate check made afterwards like `bpstat_explains_signal' > to validate the source of the signal here? > > Perhaps we should make it a part of the ABI and teach MIPS/Linux about > the breakpoint encoding used by GDB, which is `BREAK 5' (aka BRK_SSTEPBP > in kernel-speak, a misnomer I'm afraid), and make it set `si_code' to > TRAP_BRKPT, as expected. This won't fix history of course, but at least > it will make debugging a little bit easier to handle in the future. > Cc-ing `linux-mips' for further input. > > I was wondering where these SIGTRAPs come from too BTW, thanks for > investigating it. And thanks for the heads-up! > > Maciej > >