From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-126204-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 81970 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 11:44:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 81959 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2015 11:44:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:44:30 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C981EC0A1462;	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t8IBiS6V029168;	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:44:29 -0400
Message-ID: <55FBF91C.8070703@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:44:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrace, testsuite: fix spurious gdb.btrace/tsx.exp fails
References: <1442565363-13628-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1442565363-13628-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00444.txt.bz2

On 09/18/2015 09:36 AM, Markus Metzger wrote:
> If the atomic section in x86-tsx.S is aborted, 

When can that happen?  Is it normal that the test sees this?

> the tsx.exp test will fail
> even if the traced output is actually correct.
> 
> Consider abort scenarios in the test.
> 
> 2015-09-18  Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
> 
> testsuite/
> 	* gdb.btrace/tsx.exp: Consider multiple correct outputs in the record
> 	instruction-history test.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves