From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87607 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2015 14:25:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 87573 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2015 14:25:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:25:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E33C0B200E; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t8GEPWR5012064; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:25:33 -0400 Message-ID: <55F97BDC.2090608@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:25:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Metzger, Markus T" , Eli Zaretskii CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/17] infrun: scheduler-locking reverse References: <1441954298-25298-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1441954298-25298-18-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <83io7h4eze.fsf@gnu.org> <55F2970D.6040603@redhat.com> <838u8d49d3.fsf@gnu.org> <55F96679.7070503@redhat.com> <55F96F76.4090108@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 On 09/16/2015 02:56 PM, Metzger, Markus T wrote: > If you're OK with this, I can add it as a separate patch and use it in the > schedlock patch. Sounds good to me. Thanks, Pedro Alves