From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111573 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2015 15:58:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 111562 invoked by uid 89); 15 Sep 2015 15:58:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:58:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800A191C28; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t8FFwldg030151; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:58:48 -0400 Message-ID: <55F84037.9040105@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:58:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Breazeal , "Breazeal, Don" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [pushed][PATCH v3 3/4] Extended-remote exec test References: <1441996698-12694-1-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> <1441996698-12694-3-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> <55F83D18.709@redhat.com> <55F83EE1.5080903@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <55F83EE1.5080903@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00337.txt.bz2 On 09/15/2015 04:53 PM, Don Breazeal wrote: > On 9/15/2015 8:45 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> This change is causing a regression. Was there a reason for it? >> AFAICS, none of the other non-ldr-exc-*.exp files got this change. > > No, I intended to revert that change, which I did for the other > non-ldr-exc-* files. You had pointed out that the change introduced > a race. Eh, indeed I did. :-) Alright, I'll push it in in a bit. Thanks, Pedro Alves