From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 61542 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2015 14:35:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 61530 invoked by uid 89); 15 Sep 2015 14:35:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:35:35 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1ZbrKW-0003hs-AQ from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:35:32 -0700 Received: from [172.30.13.107] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:35:31 -0700 Subject: Re: [obv] [testsuite] i386-biarch-core.exp: Fix comment typo References: <20150714175127.GA10807@host1.jankratochvil.net> <55F82526.4020709@codesourcery.com> <20150915142233.GA22328@host1.jankratochvil.net> <55F82B63.6010708@codesourcery.com> To: Luis Machado , Jan Kratochvil CC: Reply-To: Luis Machado From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <55F82CB0.9060400@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55F82B63.6010708@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 On 09/15/2015 11:29 AM, Luis Machado wrote: > On 09/15/2015 11:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:03:18 +0200, Luis Machado wrote: >>> I noticed this test is running for MIPS (and probably other non-i386 >>> targets). Was it really your intention to have this test execute on >>> non-i386 >>> targets? >> >> Yes, it was the intention (not in every configuration - depending on what >> secondary targets are supported on that host). >> >> We were discussing it in the thread: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00389.html >> >> I have verified now that on ppc64-rhel-7.1 it PASSes. I do not have MIPS >> handy, though. Could you at least post your MIPS gdb.log? > > I'm seeing this: > > core-file gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core > gdb/mips-tdep.c:1098: internal-error: bad register size > A problem internal to GDB has been detected, > further debugging may prove unreliable.^ > Quit this debugging session? (y or n) > FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file (GDB internal error) > The lines are a bit off, but basically we end up hitting the internal error at mips-tdep.c:mips_pseudo_register_read. I don't think the MIPS backend is currently crafted to handle reading unknown register blocks.