From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97334 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2015 14:34:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 96685 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2015 14:34:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:34:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F4EC0B2B5C; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t8AEYWQb009428; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:34:33 -0400 Message-ID: <55F194F8.3090805@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:34:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Philippe Waroquiers , Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] PR varobj/18564 regression in showing __thread so extern variable References: <1440934487.22248.9.camel@skynet.be> <86wpw9x9au.fsf@gmail.com> <1441229015.13071.23.camel@skynet.be> <86h9nbyhb6.fsf@gmail.com> <1441317832.4429.4.camel@skynet.be> In-Reply-To: <1441317832.4429.4.camel@skynet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 On 09/03/2015 11:03 PM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 10:37 +0100, Yao Qi wrote: >> We don't have to get printf involved in the test, because some targets >> may don't have printf at all. > Ok, effectively, without printf, the test will then run on these > targets. > > Find below the new version of the patch. > All your comments should be handled. > > The fix itself still need to be reviewed. > > Thanks for your review > > Any comment on the fix ? Ok to commit ? This is OK. Thanks for fixing this. Thanks, Pedro Alves