From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121818 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2015 11:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 121805 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2015 11:54:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:54:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C182D8B136; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t89BsKIm001257; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 07:54:21 -0400 Message-ID: <55F01DEC.4030209@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:54:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markus Metzger CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] btrace: non-stop References: <1441794909-32718-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1441794909-32718-14-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1441794909-32718-14-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 On 09/09/2015 11:35 AM, Markus Metzger wrote: > +# make sure $line matches the full expected output per thread. > +# and let's hope that GDB never mixes the output from different threads. > +# > +# this is quite fragile, mostly because the prompt appears somewhere in > +# the middle of the output. > +proc gdb_cont_to { threads cmd line nthreads } { > + global gdb_prompt > + set full_cmd "thread apply $threads $cmd" > + set prompt_seen 0 > + > + send_gdb "$full_cmd\n" > + > + for {set i 0} {$i < $nthreads} {incr i} { > + set test "$full_cmd: thread $i" > + > + # check for the prompt. it may be in front of one of the lines we > + # try to match. > + gdb_test_multiple "" "$test: check prompt" { > + -notransfer -re "$gdb_prompt " { > + set prompt_seen 1 > + } > + } > + Hmmm. I'm not sure I'm missing some subtlety, but it seems to me that if you used -notransfer, then the prompt will still be in the buffer, and ... > + # check for the line. and for a typical error. > + gdb_test_multiple "" $test { > + -re "Cannot execute this command \[^\\\r\\\n\]* is running\." { > + fail $test > + } > + -re "$line\[^\\\r\\\n\]*\r\n" { > + pass $test > + } > + } ... thus this gdb_test_multiple can trip on it and issue a fail. Wouldn't this instead work? gdb_test_multiple "" $test { -re "Cannot execute this command \[^\\\r\\\n\]* is running\." { fail $test } -re "$line\[^\\\r\\\n\]*\r\n" { pass $test } -re "$gdb_prompt " { set prompt_seen 1 exp_continue } } Thanks, Pedro Alves