From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95558 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2015 19:44:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 95542 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2015 19:44:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:44:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B9CD8E74F; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7QJiWSW002359; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:44:33 -0400 Message-ID: <55DE1720.20502@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Marchi , Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace some xmalloc-family functions with XNEW-family ones References: <1439848395-1869-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <86614d3rsu.fsf@gmail.com> <55D4A144.70802@ericsson.com> <55DE1272.5@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <55DE1272.5@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00765.txt.bz2 On 08/26/2015 08:24 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > I was able to test with just a few targets, those for which I was able to > build a toolchain with crosstool-ng (arm and mips). I did mingw32 as well. Thanks. > I applied for an access to the gcc compile farm, but I'm still waiting. > > I don't think I can do better at the moment. Is there still something > holding back the patch? I think you should go ahead. If anything breaks, it should be a trivial fix. Thanks, Pedro Alves