From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95991 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2015 17:54:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 95962 invoked by uid 89); 17 Aug 2015 17:54:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:54:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BB019CBCC; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7HHsQmK025399; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:54:27 -0400 Message-ID: <55D21FD2.2090105@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:54:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Merge async and sync code paths some more References: <1439398917-22761-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1439398917-22761-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <55CBA30E.9090004@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <55CBA30E.9090004@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 On 08/12/2015 08:48 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> + /* If we MI is sync, then output the MI prompt now, indicating we're >> + ready for further input. */ > > "If we MI is sync" Whoops. I removed the stale "we" locally. Do you intend to comment on the rest of the series? Thanks, Pedro Alves