From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64356 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2015 17:27:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 64346 invoked by uid 89); 13 Aug 2015 17:27:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:27:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EC384C0B5; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7DHRgST021916; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:27:43 -0400 Message-ID: <55CCD38E.8030703@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Luis Machado , Sergio Durigan Junior Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/18] All-stop on top of non-stop References: <1432250354-2721-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <55C4E3BD.8040801@redhat.com> <20150812183208.GA24901@adacore.com> <55CB9907.9080506@redhat.com> <20150812202600.GA9183@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150812202600.GA9183@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 On 08/12/2015 09:26 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > One last thought: Should we put it in GDB 7.10? Seems fairly safe, > but is it worth it? I think so. The bug should trigger on 7.10 in "set non-stop on" mode, which enables displaced stepping too. Thanks, Pedro Alves