From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 72708 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2015 16:04:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 72698 invoked by uid 89); 13 Aug 2015 16:04:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:04:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F5B9D79E; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7DG4nDF028831; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:04:49 -0400 Message-ID: <55CCC020.4000009@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:04:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , Luis Machado CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Sergio Durigan Junior Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/18] All-stop on top of non-stop References: <1432250354-2721-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <55C4E3BD.8040801@redhat.com> <20150812183208.GA24901@adacore.com> <55CB9907.9080506@redhat.com> <20150812202600.GA9183@adacore.com> <55CBAD06.4090707@codesourcery.com> <20150812205002.GI22245@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150812205002.GI22245@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 On 08/12/2015 09:50 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > That being said, I propose the attached patch. I confess I'm not > super convinced about the comment on amd64, as I think it might > become one day irrelevant. But I don't mind it that much; if > it is helpful to others... > > What do you think? > > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gdb.base/dso2dso.exp: Improve the testcase's documentation. > Seems fine to me. Thanks, Pedro Alves