From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-125246-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 63963 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2015 15:59:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 63950 invoked by uid 89); 13 Aug 2015 15:59:22 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:59:22 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A88691D30;	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7DFxJ9S011504;	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:59:19 -0400
Message-ID: <55CCBED6.8080209@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:59:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,        Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] gnu_vector.exp: Avoid some more known FAILs
References: <878u9hwxa1.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <55CB2870.5050903@redhat.com> <87r3n76vf6.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <87r3n76vf6.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00361.txt.bz2

On 08/13/2015 04:49 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:

> Right, that would be an option.  After thinking about this a bit I
> slightly prefer to go even one step further, like in the approach below.
> In my view, it more clearly separates the steps and is more easily
> extensible at the end.  But maybe I've been thinking about this too much
> already ;-)
> 

:-)

> OK with this change?

LGTM.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves