From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51837 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 13:44:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51821 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2015 13:44:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:44:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D86C12DE; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6ODiUuV010892; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:44:31 -0400 Message-ID: <55B2413E.2040707@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Initialise target descrption after skipping extra traps for --wrapper References: <1437392126-29503-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <1437392126-29503-8-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <55B17806.2060000@redhat.com> <86bnf1hksj.fsf@gmail.com> <55B22711.4080307@redhat.com> <86380dhfes.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86380dhfes.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00698.txt.bz2 On 07/24/2015 02:08 PM, Yao Qi wrote: >>> I'll test this patch on targets other than x86 (such as arm and >>> aarch64) and see if it causes fails. > > I tested the patch on aarch64-linux, and no regressions are found. I'll > push the following patch in. > Great, looks good to me. Thanks, Pedro Alves