From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29135 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2015 18:25:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29049 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jul 2015 18:25:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:25:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C349F41A5CB; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6HIOxlk011085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:25:01 -0400 Message-ID: <55A9487B.6050708@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:25:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update? References: <20150717175328.GA15874@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150717175328.GA15874@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 On 07/17/2015 10:53 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > - Eval with KeithS regressions due to GCC 5.1 (regressions caused by > GCC rather than GDB) > > For this one, the latest (private) update I got from Keith was > that GDB was likely in the clear - mostly GCC issues? Keith? That is correct. If there are gdb issues, it is merely some regexps in the test suite that need updating. Keith