From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] GDBserver crashes when killing a multi-thread process
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A3E23C.8020101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BEAE5E.7030209@redhat.com>
On 10/07/14 16:16, Pedro Alves wrote:
> +static void
> +kill_wait_lwp (struct lwp_info *lwp)
> +{
> + struct thread_info *thr = get_lwp_thread (lwp);
> + int pid = ptid_get_pid (ptid_of (thr));
> + int lwpid = ptid_get_lwp (ptid_of (thr));
> + int wstat;
> + int res;
> +
> + if (debug_threads)
> + debug_printf ("kwl: killing lwp %d, for pid: %d\n", lwpid, pid);
> +
> + do
> + {
> + linux_kill_one_lwp (lwp);
> +
> + /* Make sure it died. Notes:
> +
> + - The loop is most likely unnecessary.
> +
> + - We don't use linux_wait_for_event as that could delete lwps
> + while we're iterating over them. We're not interested in
> + any pending status at this point, only in making sure all
> + wait status on the kernel side are collected until the
> + process is reaped.
> +
> + - We don't use __WALL here as the __WALL emulation relies on
> + SIGCHLD, and killing a stopped process doesn't generate
> + one, nor an exit status.
> + */
> + res = my_waitpid (lwpid, &wstat, 0);
> + if (res == -1 && errno == ECHILD)
> + res = my_waitpid (lwpid, &wstat, __WCLONE);
> + } while (res > 0 && WIFSTOPPED (wstat));
> +
> + gdb_assert (res > 0);
> +}
Hi Pedro,
do you still remember why did you add this assert? It wasn't
mentioned in the mail
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-07/msg00206.html
I am looking at a GDBserver internal error on x86_64 when I run
gdb.threads/thread-unwindonsignal.exp with GDBserver,
continue^M
Continuing.^M
warning: Remote failure reply: E.No unwaited-for children left.^M
PC register is not available^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/thread-unwindonsignal.exp: continue until exit
Remote debugging from host 127.0.0.1^M
ptrace(regsets_fetch_inferior_registers) PID=30700: No such process^M
ptrace(regsets_fetch_inferior_registers) PID=30700: No such process^M
ptrace(regsets_fetch_inferior_registers) PID=30700: No such process^M
ptrace(regsets_fetch_inferior_registers) PID=30700: No such process^M
monitor exit^M
Killing process(es): 30694^M
(gdb) /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c:1106: A
problem internal to GDBserver has been detected.^M
kill_wait_lwp: Assertion `res > 0' failed.
After your patch https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-03/msg00597.html
GDBserver starts to swallows errors if the LWP is gone. Then, when
GDBservers kills non-exist LWP, the assert will be triggered.
Why don't we implement kill_wait_lwp like its counterpart in GDB
linux-nat.c:kill_wait_callback? we can loop and assert like this
patch below, (note that this patch fixes the internal error, and
the FAIL is still there).
--
Yao (é½å°§)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
index 7bb9f7f..07d051a 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
@@ -1101,9 +1101,9 @@ kill_wait_lwp (struct lwp_info *lwp)
res = my_waitpid (lwpid, &wstat, 0);
if (res == -1 && errno == ECHILD)
res = my_waitpid (lwpid, &wstat, __WCLONE);
- } while (res > 0 && WIFSTOPPED (wstat));
+ } while (res == lwpid);
- gdb_assert (res > 0);
+ gdb_assert (res == -1 && errno == ECHILD);
}
/* Callback for `find_inferior'. Kills an lwp of a given process,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 10:10 [PATCH] Fix crash of gdbserver when kill threads Hui Zhu
2014-06-29 3:28 ` Hui Zhu
2014-07-02 9:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-07-10 15:17 ` [PATCH v2] GDBserver crashes when killing a multi-thread process Pedro Alves
2014-07-11 8:21 ` Hui Zhu
2014-07-11 10:53 ` [PUSHED+7.8] " Pedro Alves
2015-07-13 16:07 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2015-07-13 17:32 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-14 8:00 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-14 9:13 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A3E23C.8020101@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox