From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 104185 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2015 09:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 104172 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jul 2015 09:36:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:36:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7D5A3819; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6D9a46W001757; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 05:36:07 -0400 Message-ID: <55A38684.70204@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:36:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Metzger, Markus T" CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "Joel Brobecker (brobecker@adacore.com)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] record: set stop_pc in "record goto" command References: <1436422132-8936-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <559E4F22.6040500@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2 On 07/13/2015 08:39 AM, Metzger, Markus T wrote: >>> (gdb) n >>> infrun.c:2382: internal-error: resume: Assertion `sig != GDB_SIGNAL_0' >> failed. >>> A problem internal to GDB has been detected, >>> further debugging may prove unreliable. >>> Quit this debugging session? (y or n) > > Would this make sense for GDB 7.10, as well? I think so, yes. Thanks, Pedro Alves