From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 98103 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2015 17:29:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 98092 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jul 2015 17:29:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: usevmg20.ericsson.net Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (HELO usevmg20.ericsson.net) (198.24.6.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:29:54 +0000 Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.96]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E4.68.12958.4C5AF955; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:00:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [142.133.110.144] (147.117.188.8) by smtp-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.188.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:29:51 -0400 Message-ID: <55A0010F.2030306@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:29:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergio Durigan Junior CC: gdb-patches Subject: Re: buildbot: Fedora-i686 configuration problem References: <559FC4FA.6010801@ericsson.com> <87egkgj8um.fsf@redhat.com> <87a8v4hswd.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87a8v4hswd.fsf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 On 15-07-10 12:36 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Friday, July 10 2015, I wrote: > >> On Friday, July 10 2015, Simon Marchi wrote: >> >>> Hi Sergio, >>> >>> This builder seems to have a lot of difficulty finding gcc during configure. >>> >>> http://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Fedora-i686 >>> >>> Slaves 3 and 4 seem to have this problem. The build that passed was on slave 1, >>> so that one seems ok. I don't know about 2. >> >> Hey Simon, >> >> Thanks for the message. Yesterday I set up a new buildslave and it's >> still not 100% configured for 32-bit builds :-/. Bummer. I will fix >> that ASAP today. > > It should be working OK now. > > Thanks, Ok, thank you very much!